Blog Archive

Friday, November 26, 2021

Fiction vs Fact on the Shawna Forde case/trial #3

 Fiction The wedding ring, which Gina Gonzales (surviving victim) identified as her wedding ring, and which was found in Shawna Forde's property had Shawna's Forde's DNA on it.  To which the prosecution asserted proved Shawna Forde was on scene as the crime took place and was in fact the female that entered the home & stole Ms. Gonzales's jewelry.   


FACT: No DNA matching Shawna Forde's DNA was recovered at the crime scene, or on any weapons believed to be used during the crime, or on any of the stolen property found from the home of the victims.  Gina Gonzales did not say any of the perps were wearing gloves.  She did state "they", including the female were going through the house, opening drawers & cabinets, going through them looking for something.  That "something" she believed was drugs. To which she denied any drugs were in the home.  See below excerpt of ring/dna as introduced to the jury during trial.


See additional information obtained by PI and introduced at appeal, December 16, 2016 page 3 (can be viewed in it's entirety on the Shawna Forde blog, under pages, marked appeal). 



The odds of 3 markers out of 8 matching Shawna Forde are 1 in 2000 peoples.  1/2 the state of AZ would likely match.  Perhaps even more.  This was not explained to the jury.  Had it been, the jury may have not convicted Ms. Forde.  
 


2 comments:

NoWayOut said...

The DNA evidence is incidental. She had the ring and other unique items in her possession, found by the police in her witness identified car when she was arrested. The defense offered no explanation why she was in possession of the victim's stolen property. She is (further) linked to the crime because of the possession alone.

Even more damning, are the recordings made of her while in prison attempting to coerce her son into perjuring himself by saying the stolen items were actually hers. This case is open and shut 3x over.

Rae Gaither said...

The shooter in this case, Bush, had access to plant these items in SF's purse without her noticing. So did other people. There is a lot more to come too than just this. The case is not open/shut. There is another person, maybe even 2-3 involved in this case that were never even searched for. A juror that sat thru all the trial changed her mind after reading the appeal's findings. She filled out a post conviction change of mind on the case. You can read it on here. Co-defendants state SF had nothing to do with this case. The state's star witness, & the only witness against SF, a jailhouse snitch states while on the stand, under oath, the hit on Jr. was made by a cartel leader. I have forgotten his name, but will be posting on it soon. He's in Federal prison on drug charges. Gaxiola, the other co-defendant had a long standing feud over drugs with Jr. (Raul), he also stated this was a drug hit, ordered by cartel drug boss. There's plenty other info to indicate this too, as well of evidence to show the prosecution hid evidence in SF's favor, known as a "Brady violation". Not to mention the phone unscrambling's that show Bush had SF's phone & made those text messages. Just a hint at things to come. Not to mention, we will see all about those phone calls directly from the trial transcripts.